Saturday 18 June 2022

Scottish Schools 2022

This year's tournament was very kindly hosted by the Buchanan Bridge Club. I travelled there with some pupils by train, and the rest drove. This is the final year the current S6 are eligible to play, and our strongest team were expected to retain the trophy they won in 2019, the last time the event took place.

The pupils were duly impressed with the magnificent setting of the Club, and I think it led to a seriousness and focus rarely seen at our lunch time club, held in my classroom at The High School of Glasgow. I had also allowed pupils 'cheat sheets' to look at to help with the bidding, which I think helped them reach sensible contracts much of the time.

The pace of play was noticeably faster than usual, so that we even had time for a bonus round at the end where team-mates could play each other. At this point there was something of a relaxation of formalities, and one longstanding Buchanan member told me that although Bridge was normally played in a hushed silence it was nice to hear all the young people enjoying themselves.

Given the restrictions of lockdown all of the teams were from the same school, so we were guaranteed success. Here are the final results:

1st +14 IMPsS6 A Kevin & Michael, Al & Harry
2nd -1 IMPsS6 B Louis & Xavi, John & Jonny
3rd -13 IMPsS3 Rachel & Niamh, Isla J & Caroline
4th -33 IMPsS2 Parveen & Claire, Imogen & Isla S

The reason the IMPs column doesn't add up is that there was a 5th team, who actually got the top score. However, they contained a rolling cast of adult substitutes including myself (thank you Bobby, Susan, Neil, and John). Apart from us all being considerably overage some of us had played the hands before on Monday night. I'm pleased to say on several boards the pupils did better than John and I.

The two pupils in the 5th team, Landi & Alex did very well and I think they knew it. On being told they'd finished top but were ruled out they claimed that they'd won the event but had been disqualified, though I think they actually knew all along they weren't eligible.

Here are a few of the boards we played:


This board produced remarkably solid bidding and play throughout. Three East-West pairs bid and made 3C. Winning the board for their team were the occasional overbidders John & Jonny, who got this one right and played 3H as North-South, making exactly.

I confess when I played that hand on Monday using artificial methods, we did not cope well. I missed the Club fit and played 2D-1 as East, so a victory for the pupils.

In the match between S2 and S3 this board produced some big scores. On one table Claire & Parveen made 5H as North-South for +650. On the other table the North-South pair of Niamh & Rachel also got to 5H, this time doubled by East. This also made 11 tricks for +850 and a victory for the S3 team.

In the other match the pre-tournament favourites faltered as North-South in 5S-2. Were they in trouble this year?


Not for long. Kevin & Michael were the only pair to reach 4S here. As Kevin said afterwards "it just needs a lot of guesses." He got them right for +420 against +140 on the other table. 



With a five-table teams match the results weren't clear until the end. However, Xavi & Louis must have known they had a good score here. North-South bid and made 5D=. With the Diamond finesse working and the Hearts and Clubs behaving well there are always 11 tricks, but it's not a comfortable contract. 


Finally this board produced a range of results. 3NT is there for East-West, but it's a complicated hand. Well done Imogen & Isla S for bidding and making it.

On my table West miscounted and opened a weak NT. This went round to South who doubled for penalties. East (Landi) made a good decision to leave it in, and so 1NTx became the final contract. 

As North I tried a Club, hoping to hit my partner's long suit (which I suppose I did). Declarer (Alex) was merciless. She took three Clubs, two Diamonds, three Hearts and two Spades for ten tricks, and an unusual 1NTx + 3.
  
Overall I think the pupils had a good day out. The packed lunch I'd prepared was generally well received, particularly the entire tray of brownies (I didn't get one) and the pretzels (no chance).

The quality of bridge was generally very good, which is encouraging for the younger pupils (who next year will be the older ones). The only team who played poorly were the outgoing S6A team, who should have won by more, but still scraped by. Spokesman Michael said he was "happy with the result but not the performance."

I hope next year there'll be more schools competing, though if not we'll still have a fun day out.

Thanks again to the Buchanan Bridge Club for providing the venue, the catering, the boards, the bridge players and all the support. 



Wednesday 15 June 2022

Buchanan Pairs

After a long hiatus, and the birth of his first child Xander, I reunited with John Faben for a pair's evening at the Buchanan. This was run simultaneously with the Buchanan's online pairs.

Our most talked about board was the first one:

John
Danny
WNES
3♦--3NT
-4♥--
-

John opened the bidding with 3♦, passed round to South who promptly bid 3NT. North corrected to 4♥. I cannot fault the ethics of our opponents as South didn't dither about the 3NT, so North's decision to remove to 4♥ can't be said to be influenced by any uncertainty from his partner.

North has hit the jackpot here though - as parnter has good Heart support and only a single Diamond stop. 3NT was tried at a few tables, and went four off.

Against 4♥ I led my King of Diamonds which declarer took with the Ace, curiously dropping the ♦8 from hand. When he started on trumps I snapped up the Ace, and crossed to my partner's Ace of Clubs. John then underled his ♦QJT9 across to my high ♦7, and I gave him a Club ruff for one off.

At least, it would have been nice if that's what really happened.

Declarer did really drop the ♦8 at trick one, so this defence was possible, but when in with my trump Ace I cashed my winning Diamond before playing Clubs. I knew this was matchpoints and was worried declarer had something like ♣Ax and was going to discard a Diamond. When I then played a Club to partner's Ace that was the end for the defence. I do believe John would have underled his Diamonds if I had of put him in with a Club earlier though (partly because he thought it was IMPs scoring).

Conceding 4♥= got us just 19%, so I suppose I shouldn't have worried about holding declarer to ten tricks.

After this missed opportunity for glory we did fairly well. I overbid a little but they mostly came home and we finished on 63%.

Sunday 12 June 2022

Rowan/Buchanan vs Stirling

Anna and I didn't really get the cards in this match, but we still did plenty of bidding. We played more than our fair share of contracts, mostly with me declarer, giving Anna time to eat her dinner and do some yoga. Overbidding nonvulnerable was generally a winning strategy, although I did get a bit tired of trumps breaking 5-1.

On the very last board I faced a classic dilemma of deciding whether to accept partner's 3NT suggestion or insist on my major. My general rule is to always play the major if you know you have at least an eight card fit. But I didn't do that here.

West opened a heavy 3♣ and when it came round to Anna she doubled. I responded 3♥ and Anna bid 3NT, which I left in.

In 3NT you only have three Spades, two Clubs, and two Diamonds, so it's clear you're going to need some Heart tricks. The only way this is going to happen is if Hearts are 2-2 (else you can never get to dummy), and if Hearts are 2-2 you might as well be in 4♥ (barring the Spade ruff).

Here the Hearts did behave, but as West had a surprisingly good hand he got back in twice and 3NT lost lots of Club tricks. If that wasn't the case then 3NT might still have made - and it's also not totally clear when East wins his Heart trick that he must return a Diamond and not a Spade. However, on both the tables that tried 3NT East found the Diamond switch and the result was 3NT-4. The tables that bid 4♥ both made it.

I'm not sure if Anna's decision to double first affected my choice to leave in 3NT, as I wasn't sure what her bidding meant. She thought bidding this way showed a stronger hand, I thought it showed at least one four card major (in this case four Spades). I was mainly put off bidding 4♥ as I thought trumps might split badly or they might get a ruff (and I secretly hoped Anna had a running Diamond suit).

What should it mean to double then bid 3NT here?

Overall honours were about even on our table but we lost to a strong Stirling side 14-2.